Composing a smarter approach to risk allocation in Collaborative-Based projects
Given the growing complexity of projects and the high level of uncertainty in the global market, both public and private owners have been actively exploring new ways of delivering projects that offer greater financial value and enable faster, safer completion. In response to this need, many countries, including Canada, have seen a market shift toward collaborative-based delivery approaches that emphasize proactive risk resolution and ensure that risks are allocated fairly and effectively to the parties best equipped to manage them.
Using these approaches, stakeholders work collaboratively to establish a risk-adjusted price for the delivery phase, which is only finalized once all risks have been thoroughly assessed and distributed in a strategic and equitable manner. However, despite growing interest in the rapid adoption of these delivery models, empirical evidence shows that many stakeholders remain concerned about the complexity of the risk allocation process and the lack of comprehensive, data-driven tools to support informed decision making.
This can lead to a fragmented process and undermine the confidence and effectiveness of relationships between owners, designers, contractors, and subcontractors. This is particularly concerning when parties attempt to shift risk onto others without fully considering each party's technical and behavioral risk-solving capabilities. When one party is burdened with responsibilities they are not prepared to manage, the impact extends well beyond the initial setback, causing delays, financial losses, and a decline in trust.
A new approach
Risk allocation on large-scale construction projects can sometimes resemble a musical score without a conductor. The result? Cost overruns, delays, disputes, and potential litigation. These outcomes don’t stem from a lack of effort, but from a lack of coordination and a shared objective and vision.
Imagine a symphony orchestra where success depends on harmony, not individual talent. A more effective risk allocation approach would mirror such a model, emphasizing collaboration and shared understanding. Such a methodology would emphasize that risks should be collectively addressed and assigned using data-driven insights to minimize human bias and support objective assessment.
It would consider not only technical capabilities but also behavioral factors such as trust and open and transparent communication; elements often overlooked in traditional models. The value proposition of this smart risk distribution method lies in its ability to deliver significant cost savings by minimizing unnecessary mitigation expenses, especially those incurred by parties who are not well-positioned to manage certain risks.
Shaping the future of risk allocation
According to a 2008 study by the Construction Industry Institute, nearly 15% of construction cost overruns stem from improper risk allocation. Optimizing how risks are distributed among project stakeholders could help prevent substantial losses—potentially saving billions on large-scale developments.
With stakes this high, risk management is not a solo endeavor.
Successful, forward-thinking project teams collaborate with partners who have deep expertise navigating complex risks. Hatch’s integrated framework reflects this philosophy. It combines tailored risk solutions and industry-leading assessment methodologies that apply across all sectors, ensuring every stakeholder is aligned and every risk is proactively addressed.
This kind of orchestration goes beyond technical precision. It requires behavioral insights, historical context, and a shared understanding of how risk should be distributed and managed. Grounded in data and experience, Hatch’s approach helps teams align early and manage risks collectively, ensuring the right people are addressing the right challenges at the right time.
If you're working on a large capital project involving complex collaboration, it's never too early to begin the risk management dialogue. Let’s start a conversation. Contact us to learn how our integrated risk management framework can support informed decision-making.
About the authors

Ignacio Sanz
Global Director, Contractor Delivery
Ignacio Sanz is the Global Director, Contractor Delivery at Hatch, leading the execution of large-scale EDPM, P3 and Design-Build infrastructure projects across Canada, Europe and Australia. With nearly 25 years of experience, he specializes in rail systems, contracts management and technical delivery including tunneling, elevated structures and systems integration. Ignacio is known for aligning stakeholders early, managing complex risks and consistently delivering high-quality outcomes through strategic planning and strong leadership.

Moe Roghabadi
Global Director, Risk Solutions
Moe Roghabadi is Global Director, Risk Solutions at Hatch, leading the development of best-in-class risk management capabilities. With over 15 years of research and field experience, he enables informed decision-making for large-scale projects across infrastructure, mining, and energy. His expertise spans delivery models including P3, EPCM, Alliance, and Progressive Design-Build. Moe holds a Ph.D. in Construction Engineering and Management and serves as Vice President of AACE Toronto and an affiliated member of CICIEM at Concordia University.

Sohiel Hassan
Risk Management and Analytics Specialist, Risk Solutions
Sohiel is a Risk Management and Analytics Specialist at Hatch, with expertise in project and technical risk, and data analytics. He supports clients across sectors in identifying and assessing risks using qualitative and quantitative methods. With a background in engineering and project management, Sohiel leverages data-driven insights to enhance risk management and support informed decision-making.